Tariq Ramadan on Swiss minaret ban

My compatriots' vote to ban minarets is fuelled by fear
by Tariq Ramadan.

The Swiss have voted not against towers, but Muslims. Across Europe, we must stand up to the flame-fanning populists

It wasn't meant to go this way. For months we had been told that the efforts to ban the construction of minarets in Switzerland were doomed. The last surveys suggested around 34% of the Swiss population would vote for this shocking initiative. Last Friday, in a meeting organised in Lausanne, more than 800 students, professors and citizens were in no doubt that the referendum would see the motion rejected, and instead were focused on how to turn this silly initiative into a more positive future.

Today that confidence was shattered, as 57% of the Swiss population did as the Union Démocratique du Centre (UDC) had urged them to – a worrying sign that this populist party may be closest to the people's fears and expectations. For the first time since 1893 an initiative that singles out one community, with a clear discriminatory essence, has been approved in Switzerland. One can hope that the ban will be rejected at the European level, but that makes the result no less alarming. What is happening in Switzerland, the land of my birth?

There are only four minarets in Switzerland, so why is it that it is there that this initiative has been launched? My country, like many in Europe, is facing a national reaction to the new visibility of European Muslims. The minarets are but a pretext – the UDC wanted first to launch a campaign against the traditional Islamic methods of slaughtering animals but were afraid of testing the sensitivity of Swiss Jews, and instead turned their sights on the minaret as a suitable symbol.

Every European country has its specific symbols or topics through which European Muslims are targeted. In France it is the headscarf or burka; in Germany, mosques; in Britain, violence; cartoons in Denmark; homosexuality in the Netherlands – and so on. It is important to look beyond these symbols and understand what is really happening in Europe in general and in Switzerland in particular: while European countries and citizens are going through a real and deep identity crisis, the new visibility of Muslims is problematic – and it is scary.

At the very moment Europeans find themselves asking, in a globalising, migratory world, "What are our roots?", "Who are we?", "What will our future look like?", they see around them new citizens, new skin colours, new symbols to which they are unaccustomed.

Over the last two decades Islam has become connected to so many controversial debates – violence, extremism, freedom of speech, gender discrimination, forced marriage, to name a few – it is difficult for ordinary citizens to embrace this new Muslim presence as a positive factor. There is a great deal of fear and a palpable mistrust. Who are they? What do they want? And the questions are charged with further suspicion as the idea of Islam being an expansionist religion is intoned. Do these people want to Islamise our country?

The campaign against the minarets was fuelled by just these anxieties and allegations. Voters were drawn to the cause by a manipulative appeal to popular fears and emotions. Posters featured a woman wearing a burka with the minarets drawn as weapons on a colonised Swiss flag. The claim was made that Islam is fundamentally incompatible with Swiss values. (The UDC has in the past demanded my citizenship be revoked because I was defending Islamic values too openly.) Its media strategy was simple but effective. Provoke controversy wherever it can be inflamed. Spread a sense of victimhood among the Swiss people: we are under siege, the Muslims are silently colonising us and we are losing our very roots and culture. This strategy worked. The Swiss majority are sending a clear message to their Muslim fellow citizens: we do not trust you and the best Muslim for us is the Muslim we cannot see.

Who is to be blamed? I have been repeating for years to Muslim people that they have to be positively visible, active and proactive within their respective western societies. In Switzerland, over the past few months, Muslims have striven to remain hidden in order to avoid a clash. It would have been more useful to create new alliances with all these Swiss organisations and political parties that were clearly against the initiative. Swiss Muslims have their share of responsibility but one must add that the political parties, in Europe as in Switzerland have become cowed, and shy from any courageous policies towards religious and cultural pluralism. It is as if the populists set the tone and the rest follow. They fail to assert that Islam is by now a Swiss and a European religion and that Muslim citizens are largely "integrated". That we face common challenges, such as unemployment, poverty and violence – challenges we must face together. We cannot blame the populists alone – it is a wider failure, a lack of courage, a terrible and narrow-minded lack of trust in their new Muslim citizens.

Tariq Ramadan, a Swiss citizen, is professor of contemporary Islamic studies at Oxford University. His most recent book is What I Believe
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/nov/29/swiss-vote-ba...

Muslims must integrate!

The problem with the UK is their brand of multiculturalism places Muslims in ghettoes, where they do not have to interact with non-Muslims if they choose not to.

Too many areas of London remind you of the oppressive nature of Pakistan and my ancestral Afghanistan.

I'm sorry to say, but Muslims need to integrate.

In the United States, Muslims, even refugees are forced to interact with non-Muslims and the unfamiliar.

In fact, integration was what Tariq Ramadan recommends for Swiss Muslims as well:
"Who is to be blamed? I have been repeating for years to Muslim people that they have to be positively visible, active and proactive within their respective western societies. In Switzerland, over the past few months, Muslims have striven to remain hidden in order to avoid a clash."
Not sure why you're mentioning the UK?
Muslims all over Europe are often poorly integrated. Often it's a result of their origins; many are refugees from various conflicts who often don't know the language of their host countries, or relatively uneducated workers who came over during the postwar labour shortages of the 1950s/60s. This is a very different situation from the US, where uneducated people are hardly ever allowed to immigrate. Educated professional immigrants will obviously have an easier time of it.

America has Muslim refugees from Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Chechnya, Somalia, Sudan, etc.

However, even those these communities tend to cluster to their own kind, multiculturalism in America does not permit "separate but equal" facilities where you have proposals for shariah courts to dictate family law for Muslims instead of these matters being settled in a secular court of law.

America is not Canada which has European style multiculturalism.

Muslims have been too cowardly to speak out against extremism.

The disorganized nature of Islam in terms of their being no clergy or any Ahmed being allowed to lead a congregation in prayer may be part of the problem.

People will cling to their "guns and religion" as Obama said on the campaign trail when they fear the unknown.

The reaction by Europeans against the Muslim minority should not be surprising.

In my view, this situation has arisen as a result of the Western civilization becoming a Godless secular society. And when they observe the Muslims still practicing their religion, it irks them.
Churches are closing down and mosques are getting built and are always crowded with worshippers - a fear psychosis manifests.
If the western society can get their act together and get back to their religions & its values, this situation will neutralize.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content Syndicate content